Should We Follow the Rabbis? Pt 5

This is the fifth part of a series summarizing and discussing a paper by Dr. Mark Kinzer delivered at the 2003 Hashivenu Forum. In Part 1, I have a link to the original paper. I recommend you read Parts 1-4 before reading Part 5.

Thus far we have defined what Oral Torah is and suggested a healthy view of its origin and authority. Oral Torah is not a mythical body of law delivered to Moses on Sinai, but the working out through the generations in Israel of a way to keep the Torah. Torah does not give answers to many practical questions of observance. Oral Torah is the system of guidelines for the community of Israel about how to keep Torah. Oral Torah is rabbinic tradition.

We have also considered a biblical basis for rabbinic tradition: the Torah commands in Deuteronomy 16 and 17 for Israel to establish a central court to determine rulings about Torah life. Now we will look at the New Testament for further guidance. How does the New Testament treat rabbinic tradition?

Let me say from the outset, many Christians and Messianic Jews would be quick to say, “Yeshua opposed rabbinic tradition.” After all, there are many criticisms and denunciations of the Pharisees in the gospels. But let’s see what Dr. Kinzer has to say.

First, Dr. Kinzer suggests that there are strong continuities between pre-70 Pharisaism and post-70 Rabbinic Judaism. This is not as obvious a point as it might sound. Dr. Kinzer didn’t say this, but I will: we have been subjected for years to bad scholarship where rabbinic literature is directly equated with the Judaism of Yeshua’s day. You cannot quote the Mishnah and act as though it was the tradition of Yeshua’s time. The Mishnah was written down around 200 C.E. and a great many changes happened after the Temple was destroyed in 70 C.E. Nonetheless, I feel Dr. Kinzer’s point stands: there is at least a parallel between pre-70 Pharisaism and post-70 Rabbinic Judaism.

Therefore, the principle Dr. Kinzer goes by is that the New Testament attitude toward Pharisaism tells us something about Rabbinic Judaism. Josephus, writing in 96 C.E., affirms that the Pharisees passed down traditions about how to keep the Torah, traditions opposed by the Sadducees who had a Torah-only position (Antiquities 13:297). The Pharisees called the ”the traditions of the elders.” As far as we know, there was as yet no claim to Mosaic authority for these traditions.

Dr. Kinzer asks, “How do the New Testament documents respond to these traditions of the elders?” The first test case is ritual handwashing (netillat yadai’m). Many would be quick to say, “Yeshua opposed the ritual handwashing?” Dr. Kinzer suggests this interpretation is too hasty.

The Pharisees criticized Yeshua’s disciples for not washing their hands (Matt. 15 and Mark 7), but they did not say that Yeshua also abstained from the practice. It is likely that Yeshua practiced handwashing but did not teach his disciples that it was required. That is, he perhaps followed the tradition without making it mandatory. Also, the criticism was only of SOME of Yeshua’s followers, not all (Mark 7:2). Perhaps some of the disciples did wash hands.

Dr. Kinzer then makes an important argument, one we should consider. It is hard to imagine a Pharisee asking a Sadducee, “Why don’t your students wash their hands? It is reasonable, then, to assume that the Pharisees regarded Yeshua as one of their own, a tradition-keeping Jew.

Yeshua’s response to the Pharisees suggests two problems he had with the traditions: (1) he sees their preoccupation with ritual observances outweighing greater concerns of love and justice and (2) he opposes occasions where the traditions of the elders are allowed to outweigh biblical commands. Yeshua cites examples of both, ritual overpowering love and tradition overpowering scripture.

What then? Has Yeshua dismissed the tradition entirely? The fact that Yeshua appears to keep the traditions tells us he did not reject them wholesale. Dr. Kinzer suggests a better understanding: a prophetic corrective. The prophets spoke strongly about wrongs done in the worship of Israel but they did not oppose the worship of Israel. They sought to make it right. Yeshua was seeking to influence the tradition and not overturn it.

It is often overlooked in Matthew 23:23-24 that Yeshua affirmed the details of traditions (tithing herbs, which was not a biblical law) while calling for a greater emphasis on biblical love and justice. This is prophetic correction, not opposition to the entire enterprise.

I will stop here for today. This is plenty to chew on. Tomorrow we will continue looking at the New Testament and Rabbinic Tradition. For now, here are questions for thought and discussion:
1. Knowing that the Pharisees criticized only some of Yeshua’s disciples for not washing hands and that Yeshua affirmed the tradition of tithing herbs, is it still possible to argue that Yeshua rejected tradition? If you can make an argument, I’d like to see it.
2. How does prophetic correction serve as a better model (hint: consider Isaiah 1:10-15 as a paradigm)?
3. How does this change the way you view your Messianic Jewish lifestyle? (note: We are not arguing here that non-Jewish Christians are bound to Torah and tradition)

About Derek Leman

IT guy working in the associations industry. Formerly a congregational rabbi. Dad of 8. Nerd.
This entry was posted in Judaism, Mark Kinzer, Messianic Jewish, Torah. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Should We Follow the Rabbis? Pt 5

  1. A quick point of correction that both you and Kinzer seem to have missed: While it’s true that Matthew and Mark strongly imply that Yeshua (and many of His talimidim) were keeping the hand-washing tradition, there is another account in Luke 11:37ff in which Yeshua, invited to dinner by a Pharisee, purposefully does NOT wash His hands as a prelude to correcting the Pharisaical overemphasis on ritual cleanliness.

  2. Mikha’el:

    You are correct. Thanks for pointing that out.

    It fits with the explanation Dr. Kinzer gave, however. Yeshua followed the tradition but did not regard it as a requirement. In other words, handwashing is a positive discipline but it should not be a law in and of itself. Thus, Yeshua did not require it of his disciples and he felt free to abstain from the practice when he wanted to.

    Thanks and hope you’ll add insights here again in the future.

    Derek

  3. Again, I think your analysis on this topic in general is spot-on. I would ask, though, the point of saying that “We are not arguing here that non-Jewish Christians are bound to Torah and tradition.” What do you mean “bound to Torah and tradition”? If you mean they are not dependent on it to receive salvation, I would agree… but then, neither are Jews, by that definition. If you mean that they should not keep the commandments or that they, as part of Israel, are not called to living the commandments as the way to live a righteous life, I would have to disagree. Scripture is very clear: there is to be one Torah for all Israel, whether you’re native-born or a ger (Righteous non-Jews, grafted into Israel by faith).

  4. I think Rabbi Bernay is correct in asking a few clarifying questions. The role of tradition must be seen as non salvific for all or none. I think Paul makes it very clear in Romans that it is not a righteousness that is by the law that saves, but a righteousness that is by faith… exemplified in Abraham.

    However it is clear that through sanctification the righteousness that is by faith (which is not our righteousness but His applied on our behalf) is lived out in obedience… This than is the question… obedience to whom and to what?

    This i believe was Yeshua’s point it is obedience to God that matters. It is only the obedience to God that reflects the condition of the heart, a heart that is obedient by faith – hence His reference to Isaiah in Matt 15. “these people honor me with their lips but their hearts are far from me”

    The statement in regards to hand washings is to correct their misconception that their practice makes that which is common holy. Yeshua states that the problem is not the obedience to the tradition regarding the dirt on their hands, but the disobedience of their heart regarding the person of God (it is important to remember at this point that the law of God flows out of his nature “Be Holy, as I am Holy”).

    Therefore what is needed to make the common holy is not the cleaning of hands, but the cleansing of the heart. This is was provided once for all through Yeshua Himself.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s