Suddenly Sabra and Jews for Jesus

I just read an article in the Jerusalem Post and it brought up for me my former life and a whole host of issues about Jewish-Christian relations.

“Suddenly Sabra” is a recent American immigrant to Israel. She comes from the deep south (who knows, maybe Atlanta). She is liberal and in favor of a two-state solution in Israel and even says she does not believe Israel needs a Jewish majority to thrive and survive. (Note: Sabra is a nickname for native Israelis and is being used tongue-in-cheek as this young lady is an immigrant and not a Sabra).

She is someone who has a bad taste in her mouth from Christian Missions to the Jews and particularly Jews for Jesus.

jforj.600Recently on a Friday afternoon, Suddenly Sabra, went out for humus with her boyfriend (husband?). This is a common ritual in Tel Aviv for the many ready to slow down for a Shabbat experience and enjoy their weekend. The humus restaurants are usually quite crowded. This week, they were crowded with a band of Jews for Jesus in their blue shirts.

Suddenly Sabra was mortified and then furious at the intrusion of these Jew-converting missionaries in “her” humus hangout. The intensity of her emotion came from a lifetime experience in the U.S. of dealing with such missionaries. Her grandfather had taught her to deal with them on the street with a simple comeback line: “Jesus was a good Jewish boy.”

What is the source of such hard feelings a liberal, young Jew feels for these Jews for Jesus missionaries? Is her animus justified or ridiculous?

While I never worked for Jews for Jesus, I did work for a Christian mission in Atlanta called Light of Messiah. I used to stand on street corners, such as International and Peachtree in downtown Atlanta, handing out pamphlets for God. I saw myself as a modern disciple of Paul the Apostle, preaching in the synagogues and market-places. I distributed hundreds of thousands of pamphlets and occasionally encountered angry Jews on the street. Angry Jews were a sign of blessed success.

My own feeling now is that Christian missions to the Jews are woefully misguided and much more effective at fundraising amongst naïve Christians than at introducing Messiah to his own Jewish people.

If that verdict sounds harsh, believe me, I feel it too. I know these people and they were part of my world for a decade. I know them as good parents and dedicated followers of Jesus who practice love and good deeds. I know them as salt of the earth, caring people. But there is something rotten at the core which spoils the whole, something which explains the ire of little Suddenly Sabra at her humus café in Tel Aviv.

Christian missions to the Jews fail on three accounts, in my opinion. First, their view of Jewish people is a very low one in spite of their professed love. Second, they offer a shallow half-gospel to their own Jewish people. Third, they play to the donors at the expense of their alleged people.

As I am writing this, I think of friends in these Christian missions for whom I have an abiding affection. There is much we agree about. I do think Messiah is so needed by our people, religious and non-religious, old and young. I think I am no less passionate about my desire to see Messiah known amongst his own people. But I do not believe the end justifies the means. Messiah must be made known as Messiah would have it and not through deliberate conflict which undermines the very message.

To my old friends in these Christian missions, I urge the consideration of these three critiques and a willingness to change. It could happen just as surely as our Jewish people could start calling on Yeshua as Messiah. It must happen or the Christian missions will go out of existence because their era in evangelical Christianity is closing as evangelical Christianity itself is changing and adapting.

First, I urge my friends in Christian missions to repent of their low view of Jewish people, history, culture, and religion. That low view is epitomized by a recent commenter here, himself a volunteer with a Christian mission, who criticized me for associating with “unregenerate rabbis.” This is a world view in which the majority of humanity walks around with a mark on their forehead: “unregenerate, worthless and dead until such time as they are turned on by God.” It is interesting that the key verse for this view, from Ephesians 2, was used not to demean humanity, but to praise the new life God gives. I do not believe, nor does Biblical theology support, the idea that apart from Messiah, humanity is worthless. Analogies like being dead and coming to life should not be pressed so far. When they begin to contradict the numerous Biblical examples of God working in humanity apart from Messiah, then such analogies are being abused.

This is not the place to demonstrate my point, I am going on too long already, but the “unregenerate” rabbis have the hand of God all over their work. Have many of the rabbis of tradition made sinful and erroneous statements? Of course and so do we “regenerate” people. But those who castigate the damnable “rabbis” generally know so little about them they couldn’t even write a couple of fortune cookies worth of profound rabbinical sayings.

Second, I urge my old friends in Christian missions to offer a whole gospel. The gospel is surely not, “God has a wonderful plan for your life, to take you to heaven when you die.” Evangelical Christian thinkers and movers (I might name Scot McKnight as a very promising example) are moving away from this shallow, revivalistic gospel in droves. The gospel is about the coming reign of God, the kingdom, and being part of God’s work now as we wait for its full arrival then. God does not call us out of the world into the smug fellowship of the “regenerate,” but into our own people to be Messiah’s representative among them. For Jews, this means being better Jews, Jews whose passion and meaning is heightened by association with the only Messiah and Lord, Yeshua.

Instead, Christian missions are calling on Jews everywhere to become dropouts, walking Gentiles with Jewish ancestry. There is no synthesis of Judaism and Christianity possible in the minds of these missionaries. It must be Christianity with Jewish identity reduced to a mere label. This is not New Testament ecclesiology. It not how James and the Jerusalem congregation would view things at all, nor Peter nor Paul. It is purely an invention of supersessionist Christian theology which the missions have not yet repented of. But, oh the joy of the day, when we perhaps will see these missions and their leaders repent and embrace a full gospel. May it be in our days, quickly and soon.

Finally, I urge my friends in Christian missions to make Jews and not Christian donors the center of their work. This charge is, I know, heinous and cruel of me to make. It was indeed my experience directly in Jewish missions life. I am ashamed of the things we did to look good for donors. I considered naming some of them, but as I participated in them for a time, I am too ashamed to be so bold.

Who cares if the money will dry up if missions start proclaiming a full gospel to a people viewed as God’s beloved instead of unregenerate nothings? Who cares if actual engagement with Jewish life is not good for fundraising? Is shameless huckstering of harmful methodologies to pander to Christian donors worth it?

The wonderful thing is that the Christian donors are wising up. The days when news of many pamphlets being handed out to New Yorkers who could care less about receiving them will thrill Christian donors are drawing to an end. The changing face of American churches has its ups and downs. One of the ups is that the parts that will survive involve a wiser anthropology and a fuller view of the gospel. It is past time for my missions friends to change.

And it is too late for the generation of Suddenly Sabra. Her trust has been so violated, it will not likely be restored. But perhaps Messiah himself is waiting for that next generation, the one to whom we can represent Messiah accurately, as a Jew within Judaism calling for regeneration within and not from without.

Here is the Jerusalem Post article that started this whole blog post:

About Derek Leman

IT guy working in the associations industry. Formerly a congregational rabbi. Dad of 8. Nerd.
This entry was posted in Christian, Gospel, Judaism, messianic, Messianic Jewish, Messianic Judaism and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Suddenly Sabra and Jews for Jesus

  1. rebyosh says:


    You bring out a number of important issues. We have relegated the place of our wider Jewish Community to nothing more than spiritual targets needing to be “saved.” The position is flawed in so many ways. And studies have shown that the model is not effective. Missions organizations spends millions of dollars a year with very few results. Instead, often leaving a wake of Jews LESS OPEN to the Gospel as a result.

    Interestingly, the model of both Missions and anti-Missions groups are one and the same. Groups like Jews for Judaism could not exist without groups like Jews for Jesus. Much of this appears in an article I wrote for Kesher in 2006 ( ).

    The issue is a matter of power and supremecy. Both missions and anti-missions groups employ the exact same language. WE have something THEY need. We each present ourselves as the “spiritually enlightened” and the OTHER as those “in darkness” who need to be saved.

    It is time Jewish Missions (and other Jewish believers) finally realize we will always have a much bigger impact on our wider Jewish world as a part of it, rather than outside of it always trying to reach in.

  2. jimsobery says:

    I appreciate the candor of both Suddenly Sabra and Derek, and have in mind a continuation of the warm exchange of views after Derek’s recent blog “Who Let the Jews Out”. My thought concerns the comment by Sabra’s southern grandfather “Jesus was a good Jewish boy”. This remark could receive the friendly response “What is good? Who is Jewish? Who have we been told Jesus is?” A year or two ago I volunteered at the Atlanta based Breman Jewish Heritage and Holocaust Museum. I worked on the restoration, conservation and display of Jewish artifacts important to the history of Georgia and the southern states. As a token of appreciation I was presented with a large 517 page copy of “The Jewish Confederates”. I suspect anyone reading this book would share with me a better appreciation for Jewish culture in the south. If we were all suddenly transported around an 1861-65 era campfire couldn’t we share with our fellow citizens that the King James Bible includes the Torah besides 34 other Old Testament books, and that without these the 27 books of the New Testament would lack a great deal of evidence? It just might be that some enthusiastic Christians need reminding from time to time.

  3. joncline says:

    I agree. Our paradigm is truncated and prevents us from understanding the big picture.

  4. talmidyeshua says:

    Very good article. It goes with out saying, but I’ll say it anyway :), that Jesus and all of the disciples, including Paul, were Jewish. There is no commandment to celebrate Hannukah, for example, yet we find in John 10:22 that Jesus was present at the Feast of Dedication. This is evidence to me that even Jesus/Yeshua was a participator in the culture of G-d’s people as well as the Covenant. Can the two be separated? We in Christianity have shown that it can. Should it be separated for walking in covenant with G-d? Yeshua has shown us, in my opinion, that it doesn’t have to be. I think there is a reason that these things are recorded for us as “followers” of Messiah.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s